Click Here!

Online Edition

From the editor
Letters to the editor
Milestone
Answerman
Periscope
Campus Life
Social Issues
People
Photo Features
Education
Channel
Culture & Leisure
Science

Last Issue
Archive
About Varsity
Advertise
Media Links
CUHK homepage
JLM homepage

Also in Periscope
Which city is better

Write to us
Back to main

Crystal Tang & Wingki Kwok

A tale of 2 cities
By James Chen, Wingki Kwok, & Jess Kong


Hong Kong and Shanghai are both financial hubs of China. Both were spheres of influence under the control of foreign governments. And both have spectacular skylines. But this is no beauty contest. The two are major economic rivals. Both cities have prospered by taking advantage of their locations. Judging their relative superiority on economic, education and political dimensions, experts, businessmen and students have different opinions on which city will eventually outdo the other.
...

Of the economic rivals Hong Kong and Shanghai, which one will outdo the other remains a concern.

Aside from mere economic comparisons, the quality of univesity students in the two cities is also an important point of reference in comparing the two cities.

While Hong Kong students are sitting back enjoying themselves, Shanghai students are drilling hard to take the lead.

A survey done by Varsity has shown how university students see each other and themselves in the two cities.

From the survey, Shanghai students think the top five abilities that Hong Kong university students have are English language skills, creativitiy, self-confidence, willingness to try, and initiative, with English language ability topping the list.

About 76 percent of Shanghai students think that Hong Kong students have good English, but only 22 percent of Hong Kong students agree.

Alfred Zhu, an exchange student at City University of Hong Kong, was formerly a Shanghai Jiao Tong University student.

He disagrees that Hong Kong university students have good English.

“My professor said, ‘It was over a century that Hong Kong was under British rule, but the English level of Hong Kong people is still that poor.’”

There seems to be no consensus on the English proficiency of Hong Kong students, but it is generally agreed that Hong Kong students are weak in Chinese.

Only 9 percent of Hong Kong students think they are good in Chinese, and only 2 percent of Shanghai students agree.

This poses a threat to Hong Kong’s competitiveness in the near future.

Prof. James Xie and Prof. Jamie Jia are associate professors, respectively, in the Department of Accountancy and Department of Marketing at the Chinese University.

Both said Shanghai students are active learners, since opportunites for matriculation are more precious in China.

In China, there are only 1.6 million university students out of a total population of 1.3 billion.

Thus, students admitted to top universities must have excellent performance.

According to Prof. Xie, there are few scholarships in China. Students on the mainland have to solve their financial problems by themselves.

Said Prof. Jia: “Most Shanghai students want to study abroad, so they are highly motivated and study hard for a degree.

“But Hong Kong students only want a job and focus on the knowledge required for their desired career.

“They don’t mind their grades and they don’t know what they study for.”

The survey shows Hong Kong students have other insufficiencies, too.

Only 11 percent and 12 percent of Hong Kong students think they have a sense of responsibility and politeness, respectively, and 15 percent and 34 percent of Shanghai students agree, respectively.

Prof. Edmond I. Ko, vice-president of education and dean of students at City University of Hong Kong, does not agree that Hong Kong students are worse than Shanghai students.

Prof. Ko said top students in Hong Kong are as competent academically as the Shanghai exchange students.

Said he: “As we now have more students, the average standard of students has dropped.

“But the quality of top students remains the same.

“There is no point in saying Hong Kong students not as good as Shanghai students.”

Nevertheless, Prof. Ko said Hong Kong students do show lower competence in some ways.

“Most Hong Kong students are uncertain about their future. And they seldom strive for improvement,” he said.

On the contrary, 60 percent of Shanghai students have self-confidence.

Nearly half of the Shanghai respondents think that they have initiative, a sense of responsibility and independent thinking.

With these differences, Hong Kong students have to improve themselves so as to maintain their competitiveness.

Chief Executive Tung Chee Hwa announced in his 2000 policy address that the government planned to develop Hong Kong’s higher education.

But the percentage of expenditures on tertiary education, with reference to the total expenditure on education, has dropped for 2 consecutive fiscal years.

Prof. Ko said he is still confident about his students.

Said he: “I believe our students can compete with others. Hong Kong tertiary education is effective in nurturing professionals to keep Hong Kong’s competitiveness.”

Compared with Shanghai, Prof. Xie said Hong Kong’s educational funding is more than that of Shanghai, thus providing more resources like libraries and laboratories.

Said Prof. Jia: “The Chinese government actually did not invest much in higher education until recent years. And the investments usually go to key universities.”

Shanghai Jiao Tong University and Fudan University are two of the best universities in Shanghai.

Take the facilities in computer science departments in Fudan University and the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology as examples.

The latter provides about 200 more workstations in computer laboratories.

With more educational funding, Prof. Xie said Hong Kong universities also have better faculty members.

Said Prof. Jia: “Hong Kong has more professors with Ph.D.s from overseas than China does, thus providing better courses.”

However, even if Hong Kong has better facilities, Hong Kong may still be outranked if students are unaware of the potential challenge from Shanghai.

According to a report in Time magazine on 11 December 2000, foreign investors poured $27.7 billion into Shanghai in the past 10 years.

In that period, Shanghai’s GDP has grown at an average of 10 percent a year, compared with 3.7 percent average growth for Hong Kong.

The GDP of Hong Kong in 1999 was HK$1,230.4 billion. That of Shanghai was RMB 403.5 billion.

In the coming decade, the predicted growth rate of GDP in Hong Kong and Shanghai are 4 percent and 10 percent, respectively.

Mr. Yao Xi-tang, president of Pudong Academy of Development in Shanghai, said Shanghai’s GDP would surpass that of Hong Kong by 2010.

However, Prof. Steven Cheung of the Department of Economics and Finance at City University of Hong Kong disagrees.

“GDP reflects the general living standard, and it depends on various factors. Such prediction is not grounded,” he said.
...

Methodology of Varsity’s survey

Varsity’s survey was based on a random sample of university students in Hong Kong and Shanghai. It aimed at finding out how they view the quality of university students and economic development of Hong Kong and Shanghai. From 28 December 2000 to 1 February 2001, 199 and 233 questionnaires were distributed to students on campuses at six universities in Hong Kong and five universities in Shanghai, respectively. The six Hong Kong universities were as follows:

  • The University of Hong Kong
  • The Chinese University of Hong Kong
  • Hong Kong Uinversity of Science and Technology
  • Hong Kong Baptist University
  • Hong Kong Polytechnic University
  • City University of Hong Kong.

The five Shanghai universities were as follows:

  • Fudan University
  • Tongji University
  • Shanghai International Studies University
  • Shanghai University of Finance and Economics
  • East China University of Science and Techonology.

For the full sample, the sampling errors are 6.9 percent for Hong Kong and 6.4 percent for Shanghai, using a 95 percent confidence level. The error margin is greater for percentages based on less than the full sample.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Over 87 percent of Shanghai students have over 80 percent confidence in their hometown; only 38 percent of Hong Kong students have this level of confidence.
 

38 percent of Shanghai students think they are creative; only 7 percent of Hong Kong students agree. Sixty percent of Shanghai students have self-confidence

Only 9 percent of Hong Kong students think they are strong in Chinese while 80 percent of them think Shanghai students are stronger.

For English proficiency, 22 percent of local students and 76 percent of Shanghai students regard it as the strength of local students.

Next page