Home Blog Page 77

Sowing the Seeds of Voluntourism

VolTra founder Bird Tang hopes Hongkongers can see a bigger world

by Karin Li

Today, the idea of “voluntourism” or volunteering on overseas projects while travelling is no longer new to Hong Kong youngsters. But for 32-year-old Bird Tang Wai-wing, a random conversation during a chance encounter in Tibet 10 years ago opened the gateway to what has now become his passion and his work.

On a backpack trip with his college mates, Tang came across a fellow Hong Kong traveller, Pink Lee Wai-ki, while they were renting bicycles in Lhasa. Lee, who later went on to found the charity Light On, was the person who first told Tang about work camps, also referred to as “workcamps”.

The idea of work camps originated after the end of World War I, when German and French youths worked together to rebuild a war-damaged area in France. Their actions inspired more people to work for peace across boundaries. Over the years, the idea has spread from Europe to all over the world.

Through Lee, he met another traveller who asked him: “Have you travelled alone? You must try it once. It is a must in life!”

Tang was doubtful at first but followed through on his new friend’s suggestion, making a solo trip to Yangshuo in Guangxi province.

The experience is still fresh in his memory. “It was awesome. I could breathe the freedom. There is a lot of uncertainty in a solo trip but it also means unlimited possibilities. Breaking through the normal routine in Hong Kong, the world suddenly got much bigger.”

After a few more trips, Tang was no longer satisfied with being a tourist. “No matter how great the trip is, there is no way for me to really mix with the locals,” he says. “The locals are the hosts while the tourists are the guests.”

He says tourists can never be in touch with people at the grassroots because they do not have the ability to be hosts. He realised that doing voluntary work is a better way to interact with locals and to experience their lives. That was when he remembered work camps.

In 2008, Tang volunteered for two weeks at a remote orphanage in Mongolia, an experience he has described as “life-changing”. As there was no work-camp organisation in Hong Kong, Tang and his friends set up VolTra in 2009. The name could not be more straightforward – a combination of volunteering and travel.

The first work camp VolTra organised was at the Fresh Fish Traders’ Primary School in December 2009. Tang brought around 15 volunteers from Korea, Russia, Japan, Taiwan and France. The volunteers made artworks and performed at some elderly homes with the pupils, many of whom were from low-income families.

The school’s then principal Leung Kee-cheong accepted VolTra’s invitation because he wanted to “bring the world” to the children as they have little opportunity to go abroad.

This kind of empowerment is exactly what Tang wants to achieve through work camps. He himself had a difficult childhood – his family lived on welfare payments because his father had suffered an industrial injury and his mother struggled with post-natal depression. He understands that grassroots children need more than material support.

“They do not need money, but vision and to connect with the world,” he says.

He describes work camps as being a form of informal education. Tang thinks everyone should have three qualities  – curiosity, empathy and a willingness to accept changes – and two kinds of consciousness – local awareness and global awareness.

These are values Tang thinks cannot be taught in classrooms and he finds it absurd that teachers tell students to have curiosity and empathy. He thinks people can only understand these qualities through experiencing them. “People always think that education is about someone teaching. But in fact, education does not necessarily require the presence of teachers,” he adds.

Tang thinks Hongkongers’ qualities and worth are suppressed. Although we are intelligent, he says, we lack insight and confine ourselves to the limits of our small city. That is why Tang wants to help people go overseas to broaden their vision of the world and perhaps find change in themselves. He compares his work to sowing seeds. There is no guarantee the seeds will germinate but he is patient enough to wait and see.

Tang thinks the work camp is the ideal type of voluntary work because it adopts a  bottom-up and needs-based approach. It is local groups who initiate work camps and volunteers are then recruited internationally.

Sometimes Tang sees overseas service trips initiated and planned by Hong Kong people. He disagrees with these because he believes it is impossible for foreigners to truly understand the needs of the local people. He says top-down projects are likely to fail and cites reports about mainland schools built with funding from Project Hope. The reports say the buildings lay idle and became waste collection sites because they were built in the wrong locations where there were not enough students.

Tang says it is easy for funders to make such mistakes; they think they have the right to make decisions as they have the money. He adds volunteers need to avoid being bossy and ordering the locals around – things that work in one’s home town may not work in another environment.

In some cases, volunteers are even a source of bother to the local people. The community has to prepare supporting facilities, which they do not need, solely for the volunteers and they have to provide extra accommodation and food. In some projects, volunteers may actually hinder the work. Tang cites the example of some traditional projects where volunteers helped to build bridges in remote areas but were unused to the type of labour required.

Even when work camps are initiated by local groups and are beneficial to both the people served and those serving, volunteerism is still open to criticism from those who say the volunteers are “buying” voluntary experience.

Tang acknowledges this criticism, especially as most of VolTra’s target customers are new to work camps.

“Long-term volunteers are valuable. Short-term volunteers, to be frank, join to learn something from the experience more than helping others,” he says.

While some are critical of work camps as a bespoke experience for privileged young people from the developed world, others have questioned why volunteers have  to pay to serve. Tang thinks this is a misunderstanding arising from semantics. In Hong Kong, the term “volunteer” is translated to 義工, meaning someone who works without payment. Yet, Tang prefers the Taiwan translation of 志願工作者, which means someone doing the job that matches their aspiration. VolTra acts as a middleman which does the matching. This process incurs costs so Tang thinks it is reasonable to collect money.

But he adds there are occasions when VolTra gives free volunteer quotas. The organisation has cooperated with some corporations to hold competitions and training programmes where winners and participants may be exempted from paying the fees. But he says there is no real free ride for participants and they shouldn’t expect it.

As VolTra has grown in scale, the organisation faces different challenges. The thing that concerns Tang now is how to remain competitive and attractive in the face of new platforms such as the cultural exchange and gap year volunteering site Workaway.

Tang acknowledges VolTra’s operation model is less effective and outdated because it relies on working with an international network of work-camp organisations. Therefore, the process of handling feedback from participants is very slow. Tang worries this may drive younger participants away. He will work on changes to improve operations.

VolTra’s success means Tang no longer has time to take part in work camps himself. His role has changed from being a participant to an organiser but he is comfortable about the change.

“I hope more people can experience what I experienced. I hope they can feel the touching moments I felt.”

Tang’s goal has not changed over the years and another thing that remains unchanged is his adventurous spirit.

“Although I am not leaving Hong Kong, I am still wandering,” he says. For Bird Tang, running VolTra is similar to travelling. There will be a lot of uncertainties ahead but Tang will embrace them and journey on.

Edited by Wing Chan

Too Cool for the Olympics

Skaters fear loss of freestyle street culture as skateboarding becomes official sport

by Maggie Suen, Verena Tse & Lynette Zhang

skateboard

 

 

Reviving Childhood Memories

Let the Magic Lab “doctors” mend your favourite toys

by Maggie Suen

Situated in Tsim Sha Tsui, the brightly coloured Magic Lab provides a wide range of soft toy repairing services, including fixing broken limbs, replacing missing eyes and adding stitches. They can also give your bedtime buddies a makeover by inserting new fur and re-stuffing them to help them regain their original shape.

The brothers, who learnt to fix toys when they were young because their parents couldn’t afford new ones, will first examine the soft toy’s condition in a consultation session with the customer to decide on the cost and length of time needed for the repair.

All the toys are then cleaned by hand using pressurised hot steam reaching 155°C. The process is effective in removing dust, mites, and even the eggs of mites. Compared with washing, it is a drier method and involves no chemical detergents. It also better preserves the shape of the toy and minimises the risk of allergies. After cleaning, a soft toy can again be as fluffy and bright as it was before.

Before and after a soft toy rabbit is “healed”.
Before and after a soft toy rabbit is “healed”.

Often the brothers wear white coats and masks like real doctors because of the large amount of dirt that come out of the stuffed toys.

The Lo’s understand that they are not only repairing toys, but also the unique childhood memories of their customers, some of whom are unable to sleep without their bedside companions. After a booking is made, the owners may keep their toys at home until a time slot opens up for treatment. And they are also notified as soon as the repair is completed so they can pick up their toys immediately.

Some toys are beyond repair, but you can make a new plush pal at Magic Lab. You can choose the size, colour and texture of a teddy bear, and even put in the cotton yourself using a special machine.To give it “life”, you can insert a voice-recording machine, or a special device which mimics a pulse. The whole process does not require any needle work. Finish off with a birth certificate specifying its name and personality – and a new friend is born.

Magic Lab is located at Unit 926A&B, 9/F, Star House, 3 Salisbury Road, Tsim Sha Tsui. Call 3791 2869 or search “magiclabworkshop” on Facebook for details.

Edited by Natale Ching

Sew Much Fun

Seams creative at The Sewing Lounge

by Lynette Zhang

A co-working space shared by several craft stores, The Sewing Lounge provides the necessary tools for people to learn how to sew. It is a place where sewing enthusiasts can share their ideas and projects with one another.

Sewing used to be an essential skill yet many Hongkongers don’t know how to stitch these days. But there are reasons perhaps –  after all, it is a time-consuming process and a sewing machine would take up precious space in our tiny homes.

Inspired by a similar business in Berlin, Melanie Bell opened The Sewing Lounge in 2011. It was a first for Hong Kong. “I thought it would be nice to turn your hobby into a business and really make money from doing something you really love,” she says.

Bell holds workshops at The Sewing Lounge where customers complete a sewing project together. Beginners usually make cushion covers, pyjama bottoms and tote bags, but the possibilities are endless – one customer made a spider costume for her dog to wear on Halloween.

Collection of sewn products in the Sewing Lounge
Collection of sewn products in the Sewing Lounge

Apart from regular workshops, The Sewing Lounge held its first summer camp this year for students to join. The week-long Teen Fashion Sewing Camp was an intensive sewing course where teenagers designed and made their own garments. Some participants loved it so much that they came back for another week. “Some of the young fashion designers can already make patterns and designs,” says Bell. “It’s just amazing.”

It’s also not only girls who enjoy working with fabric. Last month, Bell held a sewing party where four boys and two girls learnt to sew together.

In December, The Sewing Lounge will hold special Christmas-themed workshops, where people can sew gifts like ties and bowties. Those who want to design and sew personalised dresses for new year parties can also join the Dress in A Day workshop.

If you are not interested in sewing, The Sewing Lounge also offers clothes alteration and made-to-order services to turn your fashion ideas into reality. “Anything that involves the sewing machine, we can do it,” says Bell.

The Sewing Lounge is located at 1/F, Sing Kui Commercial Building, 27 Des Voeux Road West, Sheung Wan. Call 9435 6757 or head to www.thesewinglounge.com for more details. You can also search “The Sewing Lounge” on Facebook or “thesewingloungehk” on Instagram.

Edited by Natale Ching

LegCo Election 2016 Results

A closer look at the composition of the new Legislative Council where pro-democracy members retain their key veto power. Localists bring fresh elements into a Chamber long divided between pro-establishment and pan-democrats, but will they opt to cooperate with other non pro-establishment forces? The answer could have a key impact on the next four years.

This is what the chamber looks like with 35 geographical seat legislators and 35 functional constituency lawmakers (including the five so-called District Council ‘superseats’):

Result_overall

And here the winners of the geographical seats in full:

Result_HKI

Result__KLE

Result_KLW

Result_NTE

Result_NTW

Where they stand on the issues – District Council ‘superseats’

In the last part of our series on how Legislative Council candidates responded to the questions first time voters told us they most wanted to know, we bring you District Council “Superseats”. With the withdrawal of the Civic Party’s Sumly Chan Yuen-sum, the ADPL’s Kalvin Ho Kai-ming and Neo-Democrat Kwan Wing-yip from the race, there are now six lists still competing for the five seats up for grabs. Competition is tight between the Democratic Party’s Roy Kwong Chun-yu and the Democratic Alliance for the Betterment of Hong Kong’s (DAB) Holden Chow Ho-ding.

Unfortunately neither Chow nor any of the other DAB candidate lists responded to our questionnaires. The tables showing the answers we received are below.

1-100

2-100

3-100

4-100

5-100

6-100

Varsity interviewed 10 first-time voters to come up with the  questions they care about the most. We selected 10, covering political, economic, social and educational issues and sent them to candidates from the five geographical constituencies and the District Council functional constituency. Out of 93 candidate lists, 40 replied. Ricky Wong Wai-kay, Kwok Wai-keung (Federation of Trade Unions) and candidates from the New People’s Party directly refused to answer, while others (including candidates from the Democratic Alliance for the Betterment of Hong Kong and Youngspiration did not respond or could not be contacted.

Here are the questions we sent to candidates in full:

 

  1. Do you support universal suffrage for Chief Executive without pre-selection of candidates?
  2. Do you think it’s reasonable to disqualify candidates based on their political beliefs and platforms?
  3. Do you think independence of Hong Kong is practicable?
  4. Would you support a second term for Leung Chun-ying as Chief Exectuive?
  5. Do you support a government buy-back of the MTR?
  6. Do you support a government buy-back of The LINK?
  7. Do you think the police force has been abusing its powers in recent years?
  8. Do you think the government should issue more hawker licences?
  9. Do you support the abolition of the TSA exams for primary three schoolchildren?
  10. Do you support think the teaching of Chinese in Putonghua should be a long-term goal for Hong Kong schools?

Non-responders: 802 Starry Lee Wai-king (DAB); 804 Kalvin Ho Kai-ming (ADPL); 806 Wong Kwok-hing (FTU); 809 Holden Chow Ho-ding (DAB)

 

Hong Kong’s interminable televised election debates

By Doris Yu

They’re colourful, long and often combative but do TV election forums need reform?

Political scientist Ma Ngok is a seasoned watcher of Hong Kong’s televised election forums. In the run-up to tomorrow’s Legislative Council election, Professor Ma of the Government and Public Administration Department of the Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK), estimates he’s watched around 50 hours of TV debates.

But even this battle-hardened observer of Hong Kong’s political scene found it gruelling to watch the recent round of debates. Emotions ran high, bickering, personal attacks and random shouting were not uncommon. Detailed policy discussions often appeared to take a back seat.  

“It is disappointing to see a democratic election has turned into such a scene,” says Ma. “Ordinary people may not find the forums to be of much value.”   

Ma thinks increasing polarisation in Hong Kong society has led to more confrontational exchanges between candidates. “Candidates should focus on and discuss key issues, but many only stressed their stance and slogans,” Ma says. He added that many would shout down their rivals while they were speaking.

A member of staff at one of the broadcasters, who did not want to be identified says, “Even though I was involved in the production (of the forums), I did not find any meaning in watching it as a member of the audience. There is nothing substantial.”

One of the reasons why the debates may seem interminable is the “equal time” principle. The Electoral Affairs Commission requires this be applied to all election-related broadcast segments. But it becomes unwieldy when there are so many candidates.

Take the New Territories East geographical constituency as an example, a total of 22 lists of candidates is competing for nine seats.  You would need around eight hours to watch all the debates on television, and that’s not including the advertisement breaks. Radio stations also organize such forums.

“Honestly, I’m not patient enough to finish the whole forum”, says Francis Lee, a Communications scholar at the CUHK, even though he believes televised debates are an important channel to keep the electorate informed about their choices.

Some have suggested that debates be limited to candidates with more support in opinion polls, which would shorten the duration of the forums. But under Hong Kong’s current electoral rules for geographical seats, a candidate can secure a seat with relatively few votes.

“Broadcasters cannot rely on polls and rule out any voice; every candidate can possibly win”, says Lee.

Still, political science professor Ma believes broadcasters and regulators should come together and think about refining the rules. “Giving Leticia Lee, Alvin Yeung and Long Hair the same amount of time would not yield concrete discussion,” he says.

Edited by Benny Kung

Where they stand on the issues – New Territories East

In this installment of our series on how Legislative Council election candidates responded to the questions first time voters told us they most wanted to ask them, we turn to the geographical constituency with the most competing lists, New Territories East. There are 22 lists angling for nine seats. This is the final geographical constituency we covered – stay tuned for our District Council “superseats” candidates post tomorrow!

Varsity interviewed 10 first-time voters to come up with the  questions they care about the most. We selected 10, covering political, economic, social and educational issues and sent them to candidates from the five geographical constituencies and the District Council functional constituency. Out of 93 candidate lists, 40 replied. Ricky Wong Wai-kay, Kwok Wai-keung (Federation of Trade Unions) and candidates from the New People’s Party directly refused to answer, while others (including candidates from the Democratic Alliance for the Betterment of Hong Kong and Youngspiration did not respond or could not be contacted.

 

1-100

2-100 (1)

3-100 (1)

4-100 (1)

6-100 (1)

Here are the questions we sent to candidates in full:

  1. Do you support universal suffrage for Chief Executive without pre-selection of candidates?
  2. Do you think it’s reasonable to disqualify candidates based on their political beliefs and platforms?
  3. Do you think independence of Hong Kong is practicable?
  4. Would you support a second term for Leung Chun-ying as Chief Exectuive?
  5. Do you support a government buy-back of the MTR?
  6. Do you support a government buy-back of The LINK?
  7. Do you think the police force has been abusing its powers in recent years?
  8. Do you think the government should issue more hawker licences?
  9. Do you support the abolition of the TSA exams for primary three schoolchildren?
  10. Do you support think the teaching of Chinese in Putonghua should be a long-term goal for Hong Kong schools?

*The following candidate lists did not respond: 03 Liu Tin-shing; 04 Chin Wan-kan (HKRO/CP); 06 Cheung Chiu-hung (Labour); 10 Elizabeth Quat (DAB); 11 Hau Chi-keung; 12 Dominic Lee Tsz-king (Liberal); 13 Tang Ka-piu (FTU); 16 Wong Sum-yu; 17 Leticia Lee See-yin (Justice Alliance); 19 Sixtus Baggio Leung Chung-hang (Youngspiration); 21 Yung Hoi-yan (NPP/CF); 22 Chan Hak-kan (DAB/NTAS)

Close to 40 per cent of young people would support pro-independence candidates

Survey finds more than a third of voters aged 18-30 say they would vote for a pro-independence candidate in Sunday’s Legislative Council Election

A Varsity survey of more than 300 young voters has found that 41 per cent of respondents identified with the localist camp and 38 per cent of respondents said they were likely to or would definitely vote for a candidate who advocates Hong Kong independence.

We conducted the survey in August and got responses from 324 people aged between 18 and 30 year-old and were eligible to register to vote in Sunday’s Legislative Council Election. Of these, 93 per cent or 302 were registered voters.

Among the factors that motivate them to vote, these respondents rated the disqualification of pro-independence candidates from standing in the election as the highest motivating factor, followed by the Occupy Movement of 2014 and the disappearances of the Causeway Bay booksellers.

The top three criteria respondents would consider when casting their votes were: candidates’ political stance, policy platform and past performance in that order. While 41 per cent said they supported the localist camp, 27 per cent said they supported the pan-democrats and 22 per cent did not have an opinion. Only 1 per cent said they supported the pro-establishment camp.

When asked how likely they were to vote for a candidate who supports Hong Kong independence, 13 per cent replied “definitely yes” and more than 25 per cent replied it was “likely”. However, 41 per cent of respondents were neutral and more than 20 per cent said they were “unlikely” to or would “definitely not” do so.

Here are more detailed figures:

INFOGRAFS-02

INFOGRAFS-03

INFOGRAFS-04

INFOGRAFS-05

Methodology:
Varsity conducted the survey from 18th to 31st of August. The online questionnaires were distributed via social media. Among a total of 448 responses received, those aged 18 to 30 who were eligible to register to vote in the upcoming election accounted for 324 responses. Our analysis and the figures we give are based on the 93 per cent, or 302 respondents, who were registered voters.

Survey team: Vivienne Tsang, Fiona Chan. Verena Tse

 

My First Vote – Lee Shing-chun

Lee Shing-chun, 20, says the current splits in society are worrying.

Lee says that when people respect one another, the existence of many different voices demonstrate diversity. But when people start insulting those who hold different views, diversity is twisted into increasing polarisation. He hopes society can remain rational while discussing various issues.

“A hundred people can have 100 different voices. As long as they respect one another, then that’s diversity. But if they don’t respect each other and insult one another and use hurtful words, then it’s twisted. Society becomes torn.”