Home Blog Page 107

Be Good!

Popular App enables users to experience the inconvenience of being disabled by holding onto a button on their smartphone

Reporter: Sabrina Poh

Holding a mouthwatering ice-cream cone, you are savoring a triple scoop under the hot sun. Oops, your cell phone suddenly rings and it looks like an urgent call. There is nothing to panic about, you may enjoy the ice-cream and take the call at the same time.

Wait, what if one of your hands is missing? Having only one hand means it may be tough or even impossible to pick up the phone and finish the ice cream cone.

Welcome to the iTunes application A Good Button.

It is a simple way to help you empathize with those with physical disabilities through direct experience. Experience it temporarily; build an understanding for life. The rules of the game are simple: Just press the button and hold it.

With one hand on the button, try to carry out daily tasks with your other hand and see how long you can hold on before letting go. At the end of the challenge, a question will appear, asking you how you feel after experiencing a disability for a certain number of seconds. You may either feel touched, challenged or moved.

A Good Button was developed by the Hong Kong Society for Rehabilitation to educate the general public on the difficulties and challenges faced by disabled people.

Most users find it meaningful and worth giving a try; so they share it with their friends.

Among them is Ann Yiu Fung-Yee, a second year students at Chinese University of Hong Kong. Yiu felt challenged after attempting to tie her shoelaces and put on a jacket whilst holding onto the button. She experienced disability for 183 seconds.

Salon Culture Brews Taiwan Blend Democracy

Taiwan’s cafes and bookstores host  a vibrant salon culture that played an important part in the development of the  island’s democracy and as Varsity discovers, continues to provide a platform for debate today

By Victor Chan and Nia Tam

 

On a Friday night before the day of Taiwan’s presidential election, customers at a café in Taipei sipped their coffee and read books. In the basement space below them, around 50 people gathered to discuss what Taiwan could learn from its past colonial masters, the Dutch.

As they hotly debated issues ranging from animal welfare to language and culture, they shared their concern about Taiwan’s development. They came from different backgrounds; authors, cooks, students, workers and retirees.

Some of them were regulars at salons, places where people can exchange opinions on the issues of the day.

Raphael and Muller, both in their twenties, attend this kind of salon almost once a week. They believe public discussion helps people to understand more about their society and gain meaningful insights through rational debate.

Salon culture has played an important role in shaping Taiwan into the most democratic society in the Chinese-speaking world.

The liberal culture sprouted in the Wisteria Tea House, a Japanese-style teahouse situated in Taipei, in the 1950s. David Chow, the late owner of the teahouse, invited political dissenters to secretly criticise President Chiang Kai-shek’s dictatorship when Taiwan was still governed under martial law.

As more and more discussions about democracy and other public issues were held there, the teahouse was transformed into the archetype of the present-day salons. Now, many forums can be found in Taiwan’s cafes.

As active participants in the debates held in Wisteria Tea House and other salons, Liao Hsien-hao, professor of foreign languages and literatures at National Taiwan University, thinks salon culture helps foster social stability by providing an open platform for the general public to vent their anger towards the authorities through conversation.

Apart from cafes, salon culture in Taiwan has also spread to some independent bookstores. Mandy, who works at Fembooks, a feminist bookstore in Taipei, takes part in various talks and forums about gender and social welfare that are held in the store. She believes that when the public’s voice grows stronger and louder, it can directly influence real politics.

It is no surprise that running a cafe or a bookstore for regular public discussions is not a lucrative business. Even so, Hung Jane, who runs a cafe named Humanity Space, says she gains in other ways through the discussions. “A sense of deliberation can also be developed among the citizens by critically debating the public issues,” Hung says.

However, some other cafes and bookstores choose to deliberately distance themselves from public issues. They still offer spaces for talks about the arts and literature, but they do not describe these spaces as salons. The shopkeepers of Whose second-hand bookstores says they do not want to get involved in public or political issues. They say theirs is an alternative attitude towards salon culture.

This alternative positioning of salon culture is itself an indication of the democracy and diversity which salon culture has helped to nurture. “Salon culture is a process that the public has to experience when learning modern democracy,” says Kuang Chung-shiang, assistant professor of the department of communication at National Chung Cheng University. To Kuang, democracy can only be learnt through rational discussion and dialogues in society.

Partisan Taiwan Press Splash Political Colours on the Page

By Samuel Chan, Elizabeth Cheung, Lam Cho-wai

Partisan and Proud

There was nothing showy about the star. But the atmosphere was as much rock concert as it was political rally,“Ing-wen! Ing-wen! I love you!” shouted members of the crowd –supporters of Tsai Ing-wen, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) candidate in January’s presidential election.

The DPP and its allies form what is known as the Pan-Green camp in Taiwan politics. And among those wearing their political colours literally at the rally were some green-clad reporters and news photographers.

These journalists are very proud of their political stance but insist it would not affect how they report the news as that would be determined by their media organisation’s editorial stance.

It is not just individual reporters, Taiwan’s media organizations are not shy to run unabashedly partisan headlines. On the day after the election in which Tsai lost out to her Kuomintang (KMT) rival, Ma Ying-jeou, the dailies ran headlines such as “MA YING-JEOU HAS WON! THE 1992 CONSENSUS HAS WON!” and “THE FUTURE OF TAIWAN CANNOT BE SOLD”.

Such headlines suggest the news stories in the papers are unlikely to be free of bias. While completely impartial and objective reporting is an ideal that often remains just that, having a highly partisan media is almost accepted as a fact of life in Taiwan.

The island’s media organisations are usually aligned with either the Pan-Blues which consist of the Kuomintang (KMT) and its allies and the Pan-Greens.

The KMT-led Pan-Blue coalition favours closer economic links with the Chinese mainland while the DPP-led Pan-Green coalition favours eventual Taiwan independence. A newspaper betrays its allegiance easily through its headlines, layouts and photo arrangements.

 

A Fact of Life

Some Taiwanese are so used to partisan politics in the media that they do not feel the need for change. Ms Guo, a KMT supporter, says a political stance is merely a selling point for newspapers or television channels.

What really matters to her is the accuracy of news, which she believes is not affected by the political stance of a media organisation. “That’s why I would still opt for Pan-Blue newspapers for neutral news,” she says. Guo only reads the traditionally Pan-Blue China Times and United Daily News.

.Members of the  younger generation may read more than one newspaper and browse news feeds provided by search engines to gather the information to form their own thoughts.

Taiwan’s journalists are themselves only too aware that news organizationsare rarely politically neutral. “When covering election news, media are advocates, not neutral bodies,” says the deputy editor of the Pan-Green Liberty Times, Tzou Jing-wen.

Tzou says there are reasons why a newspaper reports stories the way it does.  The length of a story and where it is positioned implies which candidate the newspaper prefers.

Having said that, Tzou does not believe this is a problem. She says American newspapers such as the Washington Post and New York Times are known for their clear political standpoints. “It is acceptable to have your own standpoint as long as it is limited to the editorial only,” Tzou says.

She does, however, agree that news stories should not carry any personal viewpoints, while avoiding commenting on the reporting style of her own newspaper.

Ho Jung-shin is a China Times editor but he used to work at a Pan-Green newspaper. He says many newspapers show their stance in both news stories and editorials. However, he points out that even among the partisan press,, some offer a more diverse range of voices than others. “Some newspapers have one voice only. They support either the KMT or DPP unconditionally, with little room to accommodate other opinions,” he says.

Animal Paradise or Prison?

Reporters: Dora Chiu, Joyce Lee, John Yip
Editors: Nia Tam, Beverly Yau

On a lazy Sunday afternoon, a group of monkeys and orangutans, dressed in colourful costumes, get ready for the Monkey King performance. They step out of their cages onto the stage. They drive a car and play tug o’ war. Humans clap and cheer as they show off their “talent”.

They are performing at the Chime-long Xiangjiang Safari Park in Panyu, China. The park houses a wide range of species including monkeys, tigers, elephants, chimpanzees, hippos and pandas. Some are kept outdoors while others are kept in small indoor enclosures..

Animal welfare groups like Animals Asia and Asian Animal Protection Network monitor Chinese zoos regularly. They have found living conditions for animals in many zoos are inadequate. Most zoos stage performances for which the animals undergo cruel training and are forced to perform tricks.

The groups have written scathing reports about Chime-long in their previous investigations in the past few years. During a visit in early November 2011, Varsity found the situation has generally improved. Some of the most dangerous performances, such as tigers jumping through fire hoops, have been eliminated. The zoo is large and the living environment of most animals is fair. Visitors say the animals look healthy and happy.

Zoo staff members say the animals are fed regularly on diets that include raw fruit or chopped meat. Apart from their basic daily portions, the zoo encourages visitors to feed the animals with food prepared by the zoo. Visitors can throw bananas to elephants and chicken meat to tigers.

While humans may consider it a luxury to be fed everyday, animals spend most of their time looking for food in the wild. They need stimulation, not ready-to-eat meals. “Animals need to be allowed to look for food. They need something else to do. You won’t be happy in a featureless prison with food pushed in every day,” says Dr John Wedderburn, founder of Asian Animal Protection Network.

Dr Jill Robinson, founder of Animals Asia, condemns the zoo’s practice of feeding chopped up food to wild animals. Meat-eating animals should be taking down live species and eating the whole animals, which include the fur, the skin and the bones.

Some wild animals are kept in sparse, small cells. They are prevented from portraying their natural characters. The lack of space causes different manifestations of ‘zoochosis’, psychotic behaviour displayed by animals kept in captivity. Chimpanzees bang their heads on an iron door and tigers walk along a repetitive path.

Animals go cage crazy in such tiny place. “Going to a zoo to see wild animals is like going to a prison or a mental hospital. You don’t see normal behaviours,” says Wedderburn.

The zoo holds animal performances several times every day. Elephants play football and basketball during the performance. They also have to walk on a balance beam on their hind legs. Monkeys perform human acts such as sweeping the floor and planting vegetables.

Animals also perform in the Chime-long International Circus Show. In between the acrobatic shows, animals come out to demonstrate tricks. Elephants ‘dance’, orangutans perform magic tricks, and black bears jump through a hoop. Most members of the audience think the animals look happy and healthy in the show.

Although these seem to be less dangerous than tricks performed in past years, Jill Robinson, believes the zoos are still conducing cruel training regimes behind the scenes. She says they train animals through negative reinforcement. Even if the animals like the food rewards, it is only because they are hungry and starved before the performance. For Robinson, the fundamental issue is animals do not want to be in the arena in the first place.

People enjoy the show because they have yet to realize the animal suffering. Circuses and safari parks are becoming more aware of their unacceptable practices today. Zookeepers are closing down their some of their shows as they know the public does not want to see cruelty.

Animal rights activists agree animal welfare in China is improving overall. Robinson says there are more than 70 animal welfare NGOs in the mainland now. Most of them participated in pushing for an anti-animal cruelty bill. But these groups are still small and have limited resources. They rely on volunteers and donations. Still, after years of campaigning, animal rights activists are beginning to see increased awareness and hope.

Heritage vs Development in HK’s Walled Villages

Reporters: Amy Leung, Gavin Li, Liz Yuen
Editors: Duke To, Ling Tang

Hong Kong’s walled villages

Hong Kong is known more for its high-rises than its rural villages but even in this crowded metropolis, some local communities have managed to retain their own distinctive features from the past. In parts of the New Territories, such as Yuen Long, Fanling and Sheung Shui, Tai Po and Sha Tin, you can still find walled villages.

A study of 131 villages conducted by historian Siu Kwok-kin and his coworkers in 1995 found 71 villages with the word Wai (walled) in their name.

Residents in the New Territories built walled villages for better security in the past. These villages usually contained brick houses, moats and wells. Today, most villagers welcome the conservation work on their walled villages, but some complain that their own rights have been overlooked.

Mr. Tang, who has lived in Kat Hing Wai in Kam Tin for more than 40 years, says the government must protect the benefits of the villagers while conserving their villages. Tang says the villagers have lost their privacy to conservation efforts.

“So many constraints come along with conservation. We have to open up the area to tourists on specific days at specific times.”

Tang describes the villagers as being animals in a zoo.

Tang rebukes the government for depriving the rights of the land owners in the name of conservation. He says this encroaches of the house-building rights of male indigenous villagers in the New Territories, adding that is why some villagers choose to sell their rights under the Small House Policy to property agencies.

Another Mr. Tang, a villager of Lo Wai in Lung Yeuk Tau, believes that the conservation of his village prevents him from improving his living conditions.

Although only the entrance tower and village’s enclosing walls at Lo Wai are declared monuments, Mr. Tang says villagers were not allowed to renovate their homes, even though they were falling down. He says the regulations have been eased now but it did make life difficult in the past.

Tang is also skeptical about conservation work carried out by the Antiquities and Monuments Office. He says repairs for structural problems often take too long, while renovation work on the ancestral hall would probably draw laughter from tourists. Tang explains that what he calls “so-called conversation” amounts to little more than applying a fresh lick of paint.

A visitor to San Wai, another walled village in Lung Yeuk Tau, says villagers should be allowed to make their own decisions about their properties. He suggests guidelines could be issued, but that villagers should still have the right to choose their preferred way of development.

Historian Siu Kwok-kin, who heads the Centre of Studies of Hong Kong History and Culture of the Chu Hai College of Higher Education, says Hong Kong’s conservation work lags behind places like the mainland and Germany.

Siu says Hong Kong people are pragmatic. When villagers know their houses will be taken over and they will receive compensation, they want to make sure they get the highest possible amount.

Some villagers may want to get financial aid from the government to renovate their houses. Others think they have the right to demolish their traditional houses and build new ones with several storeys.

But Siu believes traditional houses have to be preserved. He suggests the villagers could be relocated to facilitate the preservation of the walled villages.

But San Wai villager, Mr. Wong, says it is very unlikely for the villagers to move away from the walled villages because they are used to the lifestyle there. “For some villagers, they will not move even if a public housing is provided,” says Wong. Other considerations are feng shui and the roots they have in the village where generations of their family have lived.

Hong Kong’s ‘Occupy’ Protesters Stay Put in Central

Reporters: Cherry Ge, Dorothy Goh, Margaret Ng
Editor: Samuel Chan

 

In response to the worldwide “Occupy” movement that began in New York’s Wall Street, Hong Kong activists began to occupy the city’s business on October 15th 2011.

In front of the headquarters of HSBC there are posters and boards displaying messages of their protest. “Humanity needs awakening” and “End the local Monetary System” are just two examples of the many slogans.

The occupiers come from all walks of life and share a common goal: to bring an end to the current model of capitalism and social inequality. For four months, these protestors have been camping in Central day and night; they say they are here to stay.

The protestors work together; helping one another to solve the everyday problems they face living away from the relative comfort and privacy of their homes.

“Occupy Central” is at its liveliest at night. This is when most activists return to base after a day at school or work. During the day, those who stay behind can usually be seen hanging up banners, handing out leaflets or quietly going about their business.

To pass the time and for leisure, they engage in activities of their own interest, such as playing the guitar and conducting yoga lessons. They hold regular meetings to review the current situation and come up with possible solutions for the problems they face.

Everything is discussed extensively before a consensus is reached. The occupation is a group effort. There are no leaders; just different people working to ensure that they succeed in working towards their goal.

The protestors are not alone in their endeavours. Ready support comes from volunteers who bring food, drinks and even cooking utensils. Some even come to cook for them.

On the whole, the occupiers are satisfied with their camping life. But they do have encounter practical difficulties, such as taking a bath. In order to shower, they have to take a 10-minute walk across several paths before finally reaching a public washroom at a public sports facility.

Many of the occupiers are university students and KY is one of them. He spends his mornings in school, and the rest of the day back in Central. He prefers to live here rather than at home. He is says he feels a greater sense of freedom here becaue he can do whatever he wants and says whatever he likes. “I like living here, it’s really comfortable!” KY says.

He has had to go home thrice to fetch his belongings but he does not mind the traveling back and forth. Nor does he worry about being arrested by the police, instead, he wonders what he would do with all his stuff if that happened. “With the amount of stuff I have here right now, I don’t know what I’d do if I got arrested by the police.”

Barrier-free Access for Disabled Students on HK Campuses?

Reporters: Carmen Shih, Yvonne Yeung, Christine Tai
Editors: Andrew Choi, Jasmine Wong

 

 

On Information Day at a local university, a wheelchair user who wants to know more about the faculties and departments, stares at the information booths in frustration. The booths are on a podium which can only be reached by stairs.

Yet, with increasing awareness of equal learning opportunities and advanced technologies that aid learning, the number of students with disabilities enrolled in Hong Kong’s universities has increased in recent years.

According to the University Grant Committee (UGC), the number of students with disabilities admitted into UGC-funded institutions rose from 121 in 2004/2005 to 213 in 2008/2009, but decreased slightly to 195 in 2009/2010.

“When choosing a university to study at, students with disabilities will put the subject as their first priority,” said Pepper Wu, the Director of the PHAB [Physically Handicapped and Able-Bodied] Institute. She said if universities provide similar courses, students will consider their provision of barrier-free facilities in deciding where to study.

The government issued a Design Manual on barrier-free access in 1998 and revised it in 2008. These state that university buildings built after 1998 should provide facilities that enable people with disabilities to get around, such as providing tactile guide paths and ramps.

Apart from these basic facilities, students with disabilities need more infrastructure in hostels. For example, the rod inside a wardrobe has to be specially designed to allow wheelchair users to easily hang their clothes. The height of beds and desks also need to be customised.

Kenny So Wai-kin, who has Cerebral Palsy is a graduate of the Chinese University of Hong Kong. He remembers how the school renovated some parts of the hostel where he stayed to meet his needs. “Before [I entered], there was no handrail inside the bathtub. As the bathtub was always slippery, bathing could be very dangerous for someone like me,” he says.

While getting around the campus and living in student digs are a part of university life, learning is also central. So spent a lot of time in the library but he found it hard to look for books. He was unable to reach books on the top self. “You can ask librarians for help, but you may not know if the book you’ve taken is the one you need,” he says.

With a computerised library catalogue, So was able to search for some of the books in advance, but still it was better to ask for help from a friend.

Using library services can also be a challenge for students with visual impairment. Celia Yip, who graduated from the Hong Kong Polytechnic University in 2004, has low vision. “The library did not have facilities that could help people who are visually impaired. Usually when you are looking for a book, you have to ask others for help,” she says.

Computers and the internet have become central to learning. So appropriate hardware and computer software should be installed to aid learning, such as screen magnifiers and screen reading software.

A barrier-free university environment not only refers to accessibility for all but also acceptance and support from the able-bodied. Even though students with disabilities make up a small proportion of the total university student population, they should not be isolated and their needs should be considered.

In order to remind the majority of students, some universities are adding the promotion of inclusive life as a topic in their curriculum. Greater awareness combined with the available infrastructure would go a long way towards creating a truly barrier-free university community.

Artist Village in Wan Chai

Reporters: Lotus Lau, Billy Leung, Charlie Leung
Editor: Jennifer Kwok

Foo Tak Building in Wan Chai looks like any other old tenement building. It is easily overshadowed by Wan Chai’s flashy new blocks and impressive heritage buildings. But behind its ordinary appearance, Foo Tak has much more to offer.

Foo Tak Building was built in 1968. After a major renovation in 2003, the building’s main landlady no longer wanted to run it as a residential building. This was when she encountered the cultural critic and video artist May Fung Mei-wah in a conference about local artists. It was then that she suddenly came up with the idea of turning Foo Tak Building into an artists’ village.

But it takes more than enthusiasm and financial means to do the job. Lacking knowledge of and insights into the cultural circle, the landlady enlisted Fung, who has been working in the art circle for years and has extensive experience and networks in the field. She then took a back seat and let Fung do the screening of artists.

“I act like a middleman. Studios in factories buildings and art villages were not common at that time so I helped her.” says Fung.

Fung says the criteria for selecting tenants is simple: any artist or cultural group who is too poor to afford to rent a place at market rates and has a clear goal for their work is eligible to move in. Over the years, she has selected numerous artists – from painters, indie movie-makers to publishers, Foo Tak has them all.

Since 2008, Fung has been joined by Kobe Ho Ting-ting, to manage Foo Tak’s affairs. Ho also runs a bookstore named Art and Culture Outreach (ACO) on the first floor.

The books available here are very different from those in mainstream bookstores. You will not find any bestsellers because Ho only sells books that are generally neglected yet important.

With the help of her partner Sunny Chan Dart-sun, Ho started a small restaurant, Slow Experience in March this year. Unlike ordinary restaurants in Hong Kong, it is set up with a progressive vision of promoting sustainable development through dining..

None of these could have happened were it not for the existence of Foo Tak Building. “There would be no Slow experience without Foo Tak Building,” says Ho, “If we didn’t have this space in Foo Tak Building, we wouldn’t have the platform to promote this new experience to the citizens.”

The Foo Tak model runs counter to that of a top-down scheme put forward by the government. It allows for greater flexibility and freedom which encourages mutual trust between owner and tenants. For Ho, this is what makes Food Tak Building stand out from the crowd.

Vincent Chui Wan-Shun, Artistic Director of Ying E Chi, a group that promotes and distributes local independent films, is one of the tenants here. Chui says his rent is astonishingly cheap for Wan Chai. But apart from that, he also appreciates the relaxed management style of Foo Tak Building which enables things to develop organically. Chui believes this can be more fruitful than government involvement.

“The Hong Kong government can’t solve the problem by just throwing some money now and again,” says Chui, “Many times, the community can also do a good job, and it’d be great if [the government] could put some resources into advancing the community’s work.”

Another artist to benefit from Foo Tak is Roy Tsui, one of the founders of the monthly pamphlet, Black Paper. Tsui says what sets Foo Tak apart is the warmth of the relationships between those who work in the building..

“You can’t find this kind of interaction in any IFC office,” says Tsui, “This is what’s so valuable apart from the cheap rent.”

As the old Chinese saying goes “things work the best when you don’t force it”, this definitely applies to the Foo Tak artists’ village.

Dancing Life

Reporters: Jennifer Xu, Joana U, Stephanie Chan
Editor: Hazel Chung

Many Hong Kong parents might be worried if their kids told them they wanted to become dancers. The perception is that dancers are people who did not excel academically and did not have many choices after leaving school.

In reality, many dancers are graduates who have given up potentially lucrative professions to work hard at pursuing their dreams.

Ho Ka-yan an Economics graduate inform the Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK), says she followed society’s prescribed routine by studying for a degree. But she never liked it. Instead, dancing is what makes her feel alive and gives her a sense of self.

This caused tensions in her relationship with members of her family because they equated dancing with “being bad”. However, she thinks they should support her instead, since she is confident that she has found the most meaningful and valuable thing in her life.

Cheung Tsz-kwan, who is studying Business Administration at CUHK, is also passionate about dance. She wants to teach it as she enjoys sharing and inspiring others through doing what she loves.

Cheung says she will finish her studies because a degree will her safety net. But she has no ambitions to get a job at a big company and work steadily up the corporate ladder. Instead she just wants to find a stable job that will allow her to carry on dancing in her spare time.

Cheung admits that her dance schedule of five to six sessions a week does not leave her much time to study. Instead of what she gets out of dance, she can only list what dance takes out of her – time and energy. Still, she is compelled to do it because her passion for dancing means she is prepared to make sacrifices.

Perhaps Cheung can take a leaf out of Fiona Chan’s book. Chan graduated from the Polytechnic University of Hong Kong and now works as a part-time dancer and full-time clerk.

Chan has been dedicated to dance since she was a student. At university, she worked very hard as a private tutor to earn enough money to join an exchange programme in America. There, she met and danced with world-renowned professional dancers.

Chan works hard to achieve a work-life balance. She insists that instead of tiring her out after work, dancing gives her a fresh burst of energy. A physically demanding session of dance energises her for another day of work.

Dance gives her more self-confidence and self-assurance. Without it, Chan says she would have been a very shy person, someone who did not do well at school and who would have been looked down upon by her peers. For Fiona Chan, dance was a turning point in life. “I can’t say dance is my life, but dance changes my life,” she says.

Hong Kong Bikers Shrug off Gang Stereotypes

Reporters: Sandy Ho, Gienne Lee, Krizto Chan
Editor: Victor Chan

Motorbikes and scooters are a common enough sight in Hong Kong. Often they are ridden by couriers and delivery workers.

The sight of riders on large bikes, wearing matching uniforms bearing flashy Harley-Davison logos roaring through Tsim Sha Tsui are a rarer picture. Heads turn as the group zooms through the busy streets.

But this is no fearsome biker gang. It is a group of biking enthusiasts from all walks of life.

Physician Leung Kai-man is one of them. He says that contrary to the perception most motorbikers are uneducated, unsavoury types, the group includes doctors, businessmen, a choreography instructor, an architect and a coach. “We talk about everything at gatherings. It’s not only about motorbikes.”

Dr Leung adds their activities are not all about thrill-seeking,“We organized charity rides and asked for permission beforehand,” he says.

Dr Leung spends time and money on refitting his motorbikes – like repainting, upgrading engines and attaching logos. It is a labour of love but he does worry his passion for bikes might disturb the neighbours because the engines are so loud.

“The neighbors should come to get you!” jokes his wife, who like him is also a doctor and a biking enthusiast..

Dr Leung Man-ching says motorbikes do not have to be macho. They are also for women.

“Motorbiking is a lifestyle. It can be applied to fashion and everything,” she says as she shows off her collection of pink helmets and cutesy masks for motorbiking.